Waxcaps (Hygrocybe s.l.)                           Home

 

DSC_5810

Crimson waxcap (Hygrocybe punicea)                                                                                                        ©Per Fadnes

 

Waxcaps in the genus Hygrocybe s.l. are distinguished from the genus Hygrophorus 
due to different ecology. Hygrocybe waxcaps grows mainly in semi-natural 
grasslands, while Hygrophorus waxcaps grows normally in forests and are fungi 
with mycorrhiza. 
The Hygrocybe waxcaps are often characterized by strong colors. Many grow in 
clusters and lighten up the cultural landscape with their colorful presence. The 
colors range from different shades of red, orange, yellow and green as well as 
some species with grey to brownish colors.
An important characteristic of the waxcaps is the thick usually remote and 
"waxy" gills that separate them from many other gill-fungi and is an important 
characteristic.
However, the waxcaps are not always easy to separate, because different 
species can have similar colors. Therefore, other criteria become important to 
determine the right species. Both caps and stems can have surfaces 
varying from viscid to dry in different species. Some species have squamulose or scaly 
hat  while others are hygrophane (changing color depending on the dry or humid 
climate). The scales are not always as easy to detect. The stem can be smooth or 
fibrillose. The gills may have different colors, and the attachment to the stem is 
often an important feature. Some species are reddening, especially on the gills 
when they are damaged. Some species have a special smell that is often very 
characteristic and separate them from similar species. The smells include honey 
(H. reidii and H. splendidissima), juniper (Cuphophyllus russocoriaceus) 
or chlorine (Neohygrocybe nitrata and N. ingrata).
Microscopically, size and shape of spores are often used to discriminate between 
similar-looking species. Many species have more or less constricted spores, but 
this is not always an easy feature. Some species can be separated from others on 
the hypha- structure of the gills. Waxcaps is divided into 4 subgenera (Boertman 
2010), and species in the subgenera Hygrocybe have hypha-cells in the gills with 
size up to 1000 μm while the other species have much smaller cells. This can be 
an important character to distinguish some yellow species that can easily be 
mixed in the field.
To day the systematic of the genus Hygrocybe has changed, and is now separated 
into several genera. 


New systemati
c

Hygrocybe s.l. has lately been split up into a series of new genera due to DNA-sequencing (Lodge et al. 2014). Hygrocybe is still the largest genera and contains most of the colorful species. The other species discussed in this webpage has ended up in the following genera:
Porpolomopsis
: H. calyptriformis

Neohygrocybe: H. ovina, H. ingrata, H. nitrata

Cuphophyllus: H. pratensis, H. colemanniana, H. flavipes, H. lacmus, H. fornicate, H. virginea, H. russocoriacea.

Gliophorus: H. Psittacina, H. Irrigata, H. laeta

Chromocera: H. citrinopallida

Gloioxanthomyces: H. vitellina

 

 

Ecology

Waxcaps are found mainly in the seminatural grasslands and meadows. Some are 
also found in forests that earlier were grasslands. They can also occur in coastal 
meadows and coastal heath. Many of these are natural habitats currently classified
as endangered (EN) (Norderhaug and Johansen 2011). Most seem to thrive best in 
lower altitudes, but some also grow in grasslands at higher altitudes.
Most of the waxcaps appear to be very sensitive to fertilization, but some seems
to be more tolerant  (H. conica, H. psittacina, H. laeta).
Some waxcapst apparently prefer base-rich soil (H. colemanniana, H. 
citrinovirens, H. russocoriacea), while others are good indicators of old more 
acid grasslands (H. splendidissima). However, many appear to have no major 
requirements for pH value, but are more dependent on long continuity, absence 
of fertilizer and other types of soil cultivation.
Many waxcaps are on the Norwegian Red List (Branderud et al. 2010) and the 
red lists of a number of other European countries. They are therefore good 
indicators for valuable grasslands and meadows.

 

 

References:

Brandrud TE, Bendiksen E, Hofton TH, Høiland K, Jordal JB. 2010. Sopp

Fungi. I Kålås JA, Viken Å, Henriksen S, Skjelseth S, (red). Norsk

rødliste for arter 2010.

Boertman, D. 2010, The genus Hygrocybe, 2nd revised edition. Fungi of

Northern Europe vol. 1 Svampetryk, Danmark.

Lodge DJ, Padamsee M, Matheny PB, Aime MC, et al. 2014. Molecular

phylogeny, pigment chemistry and ecology in Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales)

Fungal diversity 64: 1-99.

Norderhaug, A, Johansen, L. (2011) Kulturmark og boreal hei – I: Lindegard,

A, Henriksen, S. (red) 2011. Norsk rødliste for naturtyper 2011.

Artsdatabanken, Trondheim.